Home
Welcome
Committees
Keynote Lectures
Papers
Author Index
Conference Program
Supporting Organizations
 
 

“Science and Technology: Genes, Brain, Stress and Evolution”

George P. Chrousos, M.D, FAAP, MACP, MACE (bio)
Professor and Chairman,

First Department of Pediatrics,
Athens University Medical School,
Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital

http://hcr3.isiknowledge.com/author.cgi?id=1318&cb=2

Wednesday, October 8, Afternoon plenary session
PL. 1, Olympia 2

Abstract
Life exists through maintenance of a complex dynamic equilibrium, or homeostasis, that is constantly challenged by intrinsic or extrinsic adverse forces, or stressors. Stress is the state of threatened or perceived as threatened homeostasis re-established by a complex repertoire of physiologic and behavioral adaptive responses. Neuroendocrine hormones play crucial roles in the coordination of both basal and threatened homeostasis and mediate the pathogenesis of dyshomeostatic or cacostatic disease states. The stress response is subserved by the stress system, located both in the central nervous system and periphery. The principal central effectors are highly interlinked, and include the hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone, arginine vasopressin, and proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides, and the brainstem locus caeruleus and central autonomic norepinephrine centers. The targets of these effectors are the brain, including the executive/cognitive, reward, and fear systems and the wake/sleep centers, the growth, thyroid and reproductive axes, as well as the gastrointestinal, cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and immune systems. Appropriate basal activity and responsiveness of the stress system to stressors is a crucial prerequisite for a sense of wellbeing, successful performance of tasks, and positive social interactions. By contrast, inappropriate basal activity and responsiveness of this system may impair growth, development and body composition, and account for many neurobehavioral, endocrine, metabolic, cardiovascular, autoimmune, and allergic disorders.

 

“Biomedical Engineering for Global Healthcare”

Metin Akay, Ph.D. (bio)
Professor and Interim Chair

Harrington Department of Bioengineering
Fulton School of Engineering
Arizona State University

https://sec.was.asu.edu/directory/person/838119

Wednesday, October 8, Afternoon plenary session
PL. 2, Olympia 2

Abstract
Recent advances in medical technology have significantly improved the human health in developed countries. However, these advances remain out of touch for much of the world's population. We still face unprecedented healthcare challenges in the 21st century. The prevalence of major diseases today, from the global AIDS pandemic to antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis, cuts across the healthcare, political, economic, social, and biomedical disciplines: These diseases will continue affecting the world unless major measures are taken to develop comprehensive prevention and treatment programs. Thus, biomedical engineers are expected to play a critical role in developing novel and affordable medical technology and drugs to solve global healthcare problems, especially in the developing countries. In this talk, we discuss the healthcare systems, financing, delivery and management in the world, recent advances in information technologies in biomedicine and their use in diagnosing, treating, and preventing diseases, using novel technologies to develop new drugs, technology regulation, and ethical issues surrounding the use of novel technologies.

 

“The European Cancer Informatics Landscape: Challenges for the biomedical informatics community.”

Manolis Tsiknakis, Ph.D. (bio) 
Principal Investigator and Leader

Center for eHealth Technologies
Institute of Computer Science FORTH

http://www.ics.forth.gr/bmi/tsiknakis.html

Wednesday, October 8, Afternoon plenary session
PL. 3, Olympia 2

Abstract
It is becoming increasingly clear that a comprehensive analysis of biological systems requires the integration of all fingerprints of cellular function: genome sequence, maps of gene expression, protein expression, metabolic output, and in vivo enzymatic expression (activity). As stated “Although the industry once suffered from a lack of qualified targets and candidate drugs, lead scientists must now decide where to start amidst the overload of biological data. In our opinion, this phenomenon has shifted the bottleneck in drug discovery from data collection to data integration, analysis and interpretation.” This need for integration is to some extent clear in the case of complex, multifactorial diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, schizophrenia (and other diseases of the nervous system, including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s) and cancer. Cancer is a highly complex and heterogeneous disease which involves a succession of genetic changes that eventually results in the conversion of normal cells into cancerous ones. It is obvious that a complete knowledge of these processes requires the integration and analysis of massive amounts of data as is being collected from current genomic, proteomic and metabolomic platforms in the context of exploratory research and formally designed clinical studies. Robust data management and analysis systems are becoming essential enablers of these studies. Predicted benefits include an enhanced ability to conduct meta-analyses, an increase in the usable lifespan of data, a reduction in the total cost of IT infrastructure, and an increased opportunity for the development of third party software tools. This presentation will critically examine European and global efforts towards developing publicly-accessible interoperable and distributed production systems in the health and life sciences (with a focus on cancer), via ontologies, formal metadata, service oriented architectures, and grid computing models. Significant engineering challenges need to be successfully addressed if we are going to realize our vision of therapies specifically designed to treat each individual's cancer in highly targeted ways. A range of such engineering challenges will be identified and discussed.

 

“Model-Based Strategies for Biomedical Image Analysis”

James S. Duncan, Ph.D. (bio)
Professor, Vice Chair of Bioimaging Research in Diagnostic Radiology

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine
Yale University
http://bioimaging.yale.edu/faculty/duncan.html

Thursday, October 9, Morning plenary session
PL. 4, Olympia 2

Abstract
The development of methods to accurately and reproducibly recover useful quantitative information from medical images is often hampered by uncertainties in handling the data related to: image acquisition parameters, the variability of normal human anatomy and physiology, the presence of disease or other abnormal conditions, and a variety of other factors. This talk will review image analysis strategies that make use of models based on geometrical and physical/biomechanical information to help constrain the range of possible solutions in the presence of such uncertainty. The discussion will be focused by looking primarily at several problem areas in the realms of neuroanatomical structure analysis and cardiac function analysis, along with some work in cellular image analysis, with an emphasis on image segmentation and motion/deformation tracking. The presentation will include a description of the problem areas and visual examples of the image datasets being used, an overview of the mathematical techniques involved and a presentation of results obtained when analyzing actual patient image data using these methods. Emphasis will be placed on how image-derived information and appropriate modeling can be used together to address the image analysis and processing problems noted above.

 

 “Recent research activities in Europe: supporting the evolution of healthcare”

Loukianos Gatzoulis, Ph.D. (bio)
Project Officer

European Commission

www.phealth2008.com/Events/agenda_extendida/ses5_Gatzoulis_cv.pdf

Thursday, October 9, Morning plenary session
PL. 5, Olympia 2

Abstract
For almost two decades now, significant and systematic support has been given to research activities in the domain of eHealth through the Framework Programmes of the European Commission. This investment has helped the deployment of eHealth infrastructure, tools and services like regional health networks, electronic prescriptions and electronic health records in primary care. Research activities in eHealth in Europe continue under the latest 7th Research Framework Programme (FP7), with increased budgetary support. Their aim is to help healthcare delivery systems cope with the pressure and challenges which arise from several factors such as the demographic change and the prevalence of chronic diseases. Two main directions of research refer to the domains of "Personal Health Systems" and "Virtual Physiological Human". The speech will outline the activities in these domains and how these contribute to the vision of "person-centric" care, meaning:

  1. empowerment of individuals to manage their health conditions and lifestyles
  2. development of personalised solutions for efficient treatment or management of chronic diseases, early diagnosis and prevention, as well as prediction of onset of diseases.

 

“Frontiers of Neuroengineering with: Focus on Brain Machine Interface and Neural Prostheses”

Nitish Thakor, Ph.D. (bio)
Professor

Dept. of Biomedical Engineering
The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA

http://www.jhu.edu/nthakor  

Thursday, October 9, Afternoon plenary session
PL. 6, Olympia 2

Abstract
Neuroengineering is one of the fastest growing disciplines in the Biomedical Engineering community, especially in societies such as IEEE Engineering in Medicine in Biology and Medicine. I will begin my presentation with the overview of the field of Neuroengineering, spanning the cellular to brain, and from basic bench research to clinical applications. Progress in the field is covered by the journals such as the IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering that I am Editor in Chief of, covers this field. Within the field of Neuroengineering, and the journal, the “hot topic” is brain machine interface, particularly the development of neural prostheses. I will present the basic ideas behind building the brain machine interface and expand to our recent work on the development of a dexterous arm and neural control of this dexterous arm prosthesis. The talk will present the technology, signal processing methods, the neuroscience foundations, and our work on controlling dexterous finger motions from neural signals. I will conclude the talk with some thoughts on the technological challenges faced in building the interfaces to brain and potential applications of tapping into the powers of the mind.

 

“Quo Vadis Cardiovascular Informatics ?”

Ioannis Kakadiaris, Ph.D. (bio)
Professor, Director, Methodist-UH-Cornell Institute for Biomedical Imaging Sciences

Director, Computational Biomedicine Lab
University of Houston

http://cbl.uh.edu/pages/aboutcbl/dr_kakadiaris_biography

Friday, October 10, Morning plenary session
PL. 7, Olympia 2

Abstract
Approximately 1.5 million heart attacks are suffered annually by Americans, and about half of them prove fatal, despite a host of new public health initiatives targeting heart disease and its aggravating factors such as obesity. The case of Former US President Bill Clinton, who underwent quadruple bypass surgery, demonstrates that even a former president with access to the best medical care available can have undiagnosed heart disease. Clinton himself blamed “insufficient vigilance” and stressed the importance of repeated testing as a means of heart disease prevention. Considering the large amounts of data that a comprehensive vascular health screening will produce, there is an urgent need for biomedical image analysis tools (segmentation, shape and motion estimation) to assist in screening for the conditions that underlie sudden cardiac events. In this talk, we present biomedical image analysis tools for the mining of information from cardiovascular imaging for the detection of persons with a high likelihood of developing a heart attack in the near future (vulnerable patients).

 

“On Growth of Ellipsoidal Tumours”

George Dassios, Ph.D. (bio)
Professor

Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
University of Cambridge

http://www.chemeng.upatras.gr/site/site/index.php?cid=28&this_ppageid=17

Friday, October 10, Morning plenary session
PL. 8, Olympia 2

Abstract
The existing mathematical models for tumour growth, to a large extent, are new and not well stablished as of today. This is mainly due to the fact that there are many known and unknown factors that enter the process of malignant tumour develpoment, and no convincing arguments about their relative importance are generally established. As a consequence of this search for a credible model, almost every tumour model that has been investigated so far refers to the highly symmetric case of the spherical geometry, where the curvature is a global invariant over its outer surface. Hence, no information about the effects of the local curvature upon the shape of the exterior proliferating boundary is available. In this presentation, we discuss first the standard Greenspan model for a spherical tumour, where the basic ideas are presented, and then we extend the model to that of triaxial ellipsoidal geometry. In this way, we elevate fundamental qualitative characteristics of the growth process that are invisible in spherical geometry. One such thing is the effect of the local mean curvature on the development of the outer boundary of the tumour, as it is governed by the Young-Laplace law, which controls the interface between two non-mixing fluids. A second advandage of the ellipsoidal model is due to the way the confocal system is generated. Indeed, in contrast to the spherical system which springs out of a central point, the confocal ellipsoidal system starts out as an inflated focal ellipse which, if it is interpreted as a biological membrane, provides a much more realistic candidate for tumour genesis. Nevertheless, the investigation of the ellipsoidal model of a tumour growth is by no means completed, and a lot of further study needs to be done before final conclusions on the effects of curvature variations are drawn.

 

“An effective approach to Magnetoencephalography”

Thanasis Fokas, M.D., Ph.D. (bio)
Professor

Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
University of Cambridge

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tf227

Friday, October 10, Afternoon plenary session
PL. 9, Olympia 2

Abstract
The language of mind is electrical signaling. In this sense,Electroencephalography (EEG) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) allow us to record in real time brain conversations. For this reason the combined use of EEG and MEG has important application both in clinical medicine as well as in the search for consciousness. Recent developments in the mathematical formalism of EEG and MEG would be presented.

 

“Biobanks, Biomolecular Resources and Bioinformatics for Health Care and Medical Research in Europe”

Erik Bongcam-Rudloff, Ph.D. (bio)
Associate Professor

Linnaeus Center of Bioinformatics
http://www.anst.uu.se/erikbr/Welcome.html

Friday, October 10, Afternoon plenary session
PL. 10, Olympia 2

Abstract
For future European Biobanks and Genetic Epidemiology projects it is essential to produce standards operating procedures (SOP) for efficient handling of the quality-control and data merging issues from different data sets.
Along with databases detailing sample collections it is also necessary to ensure early access to important new research tools, and that state-of-the-art techniques are readily available.
I will during this talk present some background information and I will then speak more in detail about a database that we propose can be used to complements the databases focused on the collection of samples of human and animal origin from well-characterized populations.
MolMeth (Molecular Methods database) is a database system that catalogs laboratory protocols and methods for the life sciences. It is of particular value for large-scale applications in biobanks and systems biology, but also provides value in scientific communication about molecular procedures in general. It is designed to meet a growing need for structure in protocol specifications while offering convenience for contributors and easy access for end users. Structured protocols offer several advantages over current "flat file" protocol databases, such as allowing protocol presentation be adapted for different purposes. It also provides a foundation for automated reasoning regarding protocols.